RECLAIMING CHURCH – REDUX

(Blue Text is an internet link)

(The first version of RECLAIMING CHURCH was published June 3, 2010)
(It was the first [D]mergent article by Doug Sloan)

(all scripture references are NRSV)

Have you seen or used the following sermon illustration?

Firmly, I place my hand on the wall of the sanctuary.
Loudly, I proclaim,
……This is not the church!
……The building is not the church.
……It is the people who are the church.
……Amen.

Do we have any idea what was really just said?

Do we have any idea what it really means?

If the building is not the church, then why do we spend so much time and effort dealing with this physical structure? If the building is not the church, then why is the building so important to us? After our hand-on-the-wall proclamation, have we ever taken a far look in the direction we just pointed? What happens when we extend that thought even further?

Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth,
……where moth and rust consume and
……where thieves break in and steal;
but store up for yourselves treasures in heaven,
……where neither moth nor rust consumes and
……where thieves do not break in and steal.
For where your treasure is,
……there your heart will be also.
……………………Matthew 6:19-21

No one can serve two masters;
……for a slave will either
……hate the one and love the other, or
……be devoted to the one and despise the other.
You cannot serve God and wealth.
……………………Matthew 6:24

As he was setting out on a journey,
……a man ran up and knelt before him,
……and asked him,
…………Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?

Jesus said to him,
……Why do you call me good?
……No one is good but God alone.
……You know the commandments:
…………You shall not murder;
…………You shall not commit adultery;
…………You shall not steal;
…………You shall not bear false witness;
…………You shall not defraud;
…………Honor your father and mother.

He said to him,
……Teacher, I have kept all these since my youth.

Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said,
……You lack one thing;
…………go, sell what you own, and
…………give the money to the poor, and
…………you will have treasure in heaven;
…………then come, follow me.

When he heard this,
……he was shocked and went away grieving,
……for he had many possessions.
……………………Mark 10:17-22
……………………Matthew 19:16-22
……………………Luke 18:18-23

What do capital campaigns and 6- or 7- or 8-digit mortgages (or any mortgage amount) and sanctuaries with high vaulted ceilings and proper acoustic resonance and stained glass windows and basketball courts and dining halls and fully equipped kitchens and sculpted altars and carved pulpits and custom-built communion tables and decorative carpet and imported floor tiles and comfortable color-coordinated congregational seating and vast paved parking lots and meticulously manicured lawns and lavish landscaping have to do with living and sharing the Good News? – Nothing.

What do multiple annual fund-raisers and all the accompanying effort and bother and stress and time and finding workers and managing schedules and obtaining gaming licenses and liquor permits and additional liability insurance have to do with living and sharing the Good News? – Nothing.

What do praise bands and church orchestras and bell choirs and octaves of tuned bells and multi-rank pipe organs and grand pianos and synthesizers and drum sets and adult choirs and children choirs and choir auditions and choir robes and music folders and the search and review and selection analysis and purchase of new music and multi-line PA systems and multi-screen video systems and live broadcasts and recorded broadcasts and hours of rehearsal time and church bulletins and church bulletin art work and church bulletin paper and designer fonts and newsletters and mailing lists and advertising and advertising placement and multi-media web sites and visits by unique IP addresses and the use of and the presence on new media and follow-spots and theatrical lighting and entertainment values and spectacular presentations have to do with living and sharing the Good News? – Nothing.

What do membership drives and attendance numbers and baptism numbers and tithing pledge totals and expected bequests and sustaining endowments and liturgical employees and non-liturgical employees and salaries and benefits and committees and committee meetings and committee responsibilities and church boards and church board agendas and church board votes and the consequential and unavoidable church politics have to do with living and sharing the Good News? – Nothing.

Much of what we call successful church and successful worship and being a successful congregation has nothing to do with living and sharing the Good News.

Then they came to Jerusalem.
And he entered the temple and
……began to drive out those who were selling and
……those who were buying in the temple, and
……he overturned the tables of the money-changers and
……the seats of those who sold doves; and
……he would not allow anyone to carry anything through the temple.

He was teaching and saying,
……Is it not written,
…………My house shall be called
…………a house of prayer for all the nations?
……But you have made it a den of robbers.
……………………Mark 11:15-17
……………………Matthew 21:12-13
……………………Luke 19:45-46

The Passover of the Jews was near, and
Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
In the temple he found people selling cattle, sheep, and doves, and
……the money-changers seated at their tables.
Making a whip of cords,
……he drove all of them out of the temple,
……both the sheep and the cattle.
He also poured out the coins of the money-changers and
……overturned their tables.
He told those who were selling the doves,
……Take these things out of here!
……Stop making my Father’s house a market-place!

……………………John 2:13-16

Once we begin to think of our faith in terms of largeness instead of largess; once we begin to think of our faith in terms of measurable success or significant achievements or community stature or statistically significant gains or business models or congregational models or appropriate budget processes or cash flow direction or generally accepted accounting practices or independent audits or administrative requirements or procedural transparency or proper leadership roles or managerial responsibilities and boundaries or membership trends or effective organizational structures or current and accurate and relevant identity/purpose/vision/mission statements or strategic and tactical plans or valid and useful performance metrics – at that point, we have become money changers and temple authorities, we have deformed from a community into an industry that requires exclusionary individualism. At that point, we have lost our faith and our spiritual direction and we have wandered off the narrow path. At that point, we are colluding with and siding with the Empire instead of the Kingdom of God and we deserve to be rebelled against and driven away for we are neither living nor sharing the Good News. We have become that which the Good News opposes and seeks to replace.

But if it is by grace,
……it is no longer on the basis of works,
……otherwise grace would no longer be grace.
……………………Romans 11:6

Yet we know that a person is justified
……not by the works of the law
……but through faith in Jesus Christ.
And we have come to believe in Christ Jesus,
……so that we might be justified by faith in Christ,
……and not by doing the works of the law,
……because no one will be justified by the works of the law.
……………………Galatians 2:16

But God,
……who is rich in compassion,
……out of the great love with which he loved us
……even when we were dead through our trespasses,
……made us alive together with Christ –
……by grace you have been saved –
……and raised us up with him
……and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus,
……so that in the ages to come he might show
……the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness
……toward us in Christ Jesus.
For by grace you have been saved through faith,
……and this is not your own doing;
……it is the gift of God –
……not the result of works,
……so that no one may boast.
……………………Ephesians 2:4-9

Just because I work incredible good out of unspeakable tragedies doesn’t mean I orchestrate the tragedies. Don’t ever assume that my using something means I caused it or that I needed it to accomplish my purposes. That will only lead you to false notions about me. Grace doesn’t depend on suffering to exist, but where there is suffering you will find grace in many facets and colors.
……………………The Shack”, William P. Young, pp. 188-189

The Good News has 3 inseparable messages:
1) The universal accessibility of
1)..the personal and persistent unrestrained love and unconditional grace of God; and
2) The feeding quenching clothing healing visiting welcoming compassion and
2)..the reparative rehabilitating restorative justice of the Community; and
3) The inclusive hospitality and joyous generosity and healthy service of the Individual.

By living the Good News:
We promote and provoke the unrestrained love and unconditional grace of God.
We search for and find the
…..hungry
…..thirsty
…..naked
…..ill and hurting
…..lost
…..oppressed and enslaved
…..excluded
…..imprisoned
and, both immediately and permanently, they are
…..fed
…..quenched
…..clothed
…..healed
…..found and rescued and restored to participatory liberty
…..freed
…..invited and welcomed and included
…..provided justice with a life repaired through rehabilitation and restoration
……….and, it is critically important that this is always included,
…..all who are served are treated as members of the Community.
We define ourselves as Individuals with
…..inclusive hospitality
…..joyous generosity
…..healthy service to others
“healthy service” means we understand and engage in
…..healthy rest
…..healthy nourishment
…..healthy education
…..healthy solitude
…..healthy worship
…..healthy relationship with those we serve
……….which does not include suffering or participating in or enabling
……………war
……………murder
……………abuse of others
……………self-destructive behavior
……………enslavement
……………the satisfaction of useless whimsical requests.
In this way,
we choose, join, become, live, share, and exude the Kingdom of God here and now.

What would happen if church universal assets – every congregational and regional and national property, every seminary, every camp – was sold and the net proceeds were consolidated with church investments and church cash to establish a trust fund endowment to support the services we provide to those whom we are called to serve?

When you want a new status quo – a new status quo so different that the current status quo will be relabeled as “old” – you are asking for revolution. When you desire radical counter-cultural transformation – you are asking for revolution. When you want to end the oppressive Empire ethos of piety, war, victory, peace - you are asking for the Empire to be dismantled and replaced with the Good News, you are asking for revolution. When the church is consumed and possessed by mortgages, capital campaigns, membership numbers, qualifications for membership or deacon or elder, the variety and format of financial reports, redecorating, ordination policies, the proper delineation of committee responsibilities, the aggregation and strengthening and protection of church hierarchical authority, the preference for political associations and prominence instead of being a voice and influence for justice and compassion, seasonal vestment colors, the abandonment and refusal to acknowledge congregations who dare to be excited by their proclaiming and provoking and living and sharing the Good News, the continual choosing and preoccupation with better organization over better outreach, or what styles of worship are to be offered – then it is time for an earth-shaking, stone-rolling, curtain ripping, hurricane-strength, fiery and noisy transformational revolution that will resurrect the Good News in the body and spirit of communities and individuals.

“Doing” has to be the new sole definition of faith. A “new definition of faith” will not be statements of identity/purpose/mission/vision or offering a variety of worship styles at various times and days or hosting church fund raisers that have achieved the status of popular civic events. “Doing” our faith will not promote isolation from people in need or from the present time or from planetary stewardship by valuing hope for an escape into a future post-mortal existence instead of being the response to the divine call to be justly and compassionately involved in the present reality of life. ”Doing” our faith will not be glossy advertising campaigns; bigger capital campaigns; better communication and contacts between congregations and local, regional, and national governing boards; on-line seminaries and colleges; common language licensing/ordination policies; new carpet; or more affordable baptistery maintenance contracts. It will be specific activities; specific ways of gracious and grace-full living that are the new definition. Participating in CODA or LifeLine or Habitat for Humanity or Meals on Wheels or the Mental Health Association will not be an outreach activity; it will be what we do and it will be definitive of who we are. Supporting a free health clinic or a food pantry or a shelter for the homeless or hosting a community garden will not be the focus of an annual fund-raising event; it will be part of our continuously active and visible theological and spiritual DNA. Taking a publicly visible and vocal stance of opposition against and non-participation in institutional or legislated injustice will not be an exceptional or cautious action; it will be a bold and expected response arising from a communal personality that yearns for and demands justice and compassion from all public institutions. Worship will be whenever and wherever 2 or 3 (not 200 or 300, not 2,000 or 3,000, not 20,000 or 30,000) are gathered to live, study, and contemplate the Good News – and it will be no less true and no less sacred because there are only 2 or 3 – and it will be no more true and no more sacred because there are more than 2 or 3. Indeed, “doing” will be about living and being the Good News. Worship can be and should be less of a scheduled repetitive activity and more of a community gathering to share and become better acquainted with the presence of God and to mutually seek a better understanding of the Good News.

“Doing” our faith has to be seen as a radical, counter-cultural, defiant, fearless way of living. Our faith is not to be institutionalized. Our faith is not to be measured by or expressed as largeness, cultural pervasiveness, political influence, authoritarianism, or a social or managerial hierarchy. Our faith is not to treat people with: conditional inclusion, tolerance, shame, scorn, ridicule, shunning, rejection, exclusion, or condemnation. Our faith is not to hate people. Our faith is not to ignore people or God. Instead, our faith is to value the presence of God and to value all people and to value God and people together as one community or, better yet, as one family. Our faith is to value knowledge over ignorance and value compassion over knowledge. The way we embrace and treasure and grow our faith is personal and intelligent and loving and divine. The way we “do” our faith is to be personally and intelligently and lovingly and divinely humane. Our faith is to be constantly centered in the love and grace that is the persistent presence of God. The ancient writings of our ancient faith ancestors are to be regarded as human expressions arising out of human experiences with the divine and the profane and the ordinary. Those ancient writings are to be neither considered worthless and ignored nor considered controlling and obligatory. Those ancient writings can be considered instructive and inspirational; providing examples of living either to emulate faithfully or to avoid strenuously; a foundational starting point upon which we build, reach out, move on, and grow beyond the original ancient understanding. Our faithful “doing” is to be rendered and delivered person-to-person, face-to-face, one-to-one – not by an invisible faceless remote committees or collectives. “Doing” our faith can be accomplished only with more personal involvement and presence and not with more communication technology that is newer, faster, more pervasive, more invasive, environmentally expensive, and is used to increase personal remoteness and detachment and decrease personal involvement and presence.

As he went ashore, he saw a great crowd;
……and he had compassion for them,
……because they were like sheep without a shepherd;
……and he began to teach them many things.
When it grew late,
……his disciples came to him and said,
…………This is a deserted place,
…………and the hour is now very late;
…………send them away so that they may go
…………into the surrounding country and villages
…………and buy something for themselves to eat.

But he answered them,
……You give them something to eat.

They said to him,
……Are we to go and buy two hundred denarii worth of bread,
…………and give it to them to eat?

And he said to them,
……How many loaves have you?
……Go and see.

When they had found out, they said,
……Five, and two fish.

Then he ordered them to get all the people
……to sit down in groups on the green grass.
So they sat down in groups of hundreds and of fifties.
Taking the five loaves and the two fish,
……he looked up to heaven,
……and blessed and broke the loaves,
……and gave them to his disciples to set before the people;
……and he divided the two fish among them all.
And all ate and were filled;
……and they took up twelve baskets
……full of broken pieces and of the fish.
Those who had eaten the loaves numbered five thousand men.
……………………Mark 6:34-44
……………………Matthew 14:14-21
……………………Luke 9:12-17
……………………John 6:4-13

In those days
……when there was again a great crowd without anything to eat,
……he called his disciples and said to them,
………..I have compassion for the crowd,
……………..because they have been with me now for three days
……………..and have nothing to eat.
………..If I send them away hungry to their homes,
……………..they will faint on the way—
……………..and some of them have come from a great distance.

His disciples replied,
……How can one feed these people with bread
…………here in the desert?

He asked them,
……How many loaves do you have?

They said,
……Seven.

Then he ordered the crowd to sit down on the ground;
……and he took the seven loaves,
……and after giving thanks
……he broke them
……and gave them to his disciples to distribute;
……and they distributed them to the crowd.
They had also a few small fish;
……and after blessing them,
……he ordered that these too should be distributed.
They ate and were filled;
……and they took up the broken pieces left over,
……seven baskets full.
Now there were about four thousand people.
And he sent them away.
……………………Mark 8:1-9
……………………Matthew 15:32-39

They devoted themselves
……to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship,
……to the breaking of bread and the prayers.
All who believed were together and had all things in common;
……they would sell their possessions and goods and
……distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need.
Day by day, as they spent much time together in the temple,
……they broke bread at home and
……ate their food with glad and generous hearts,
……praising God and having the goodwill of all the people.
……………………Acts 2:42, 44-47

Now the whole group of those who believed
……were of one heart and soul, and
……no one claimed private ownership of any possessions,
……but everything they owned was held in common.
With great power the apostles gave their testimony
……to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and
……great grace was upon them all.
There was not a needy person among them,
……for as many as owned lands or houses
……sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold.
They laid it at the apostles’ feet,
……and it was distributed to each as any had need.
……………………Acts 4:32-36

This way of living as a community of mutual sufficiency and support did not originate with the early church. It was a very old idea – first described in the written Torah.

There shall be one law for the native and for the alien who resides among you.
……………………Exodus 12:49

You shall not wrong or oppress a resident alien, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt. You shall not abuse any widow or orphan. If you do abuse them, when they cry out to me, I will surely heed their cry;
……………………Exodus 22:21-23

If you lend money to my people, to the poor among you, you shall not deal with them as a creditor; you shall not exact interest from them. If you take your neighbor’s cloak in pawn, you shall restore it before the sun goes down; for it may be your neighbor’s only clothing to use as cover; in what else shall that person sleep? And if your neighbor cries out to me, I will listen, for I am compassionate.
……………………Exodus 22:25-27

You shall not spread a false report. You shall not join hands with the wicked to act as a malicious witness. You shall not follow a majority in wrongdoing; when you bear witness in a lawsuit, you shall not side with the majority so as to pervert justice; nor shall you be partial to the poor in a lawsuit. When you come upon your enemy’s ox or donkey going astray, you shall bring it back. When you see the donkey of one who hates you lying under its burden and you would hold back from setting it free, you must help to set it free. You shall not pervert the justice due to your poor in their lawsuits. Keep far from a false charge, and do not kill the innocent and those in the right, for I will not acquit the guilty. You shall take no bribe, for a bribe blinds the officials, and subverts the cause of those who are in the right. You shall not oppress a resident alien; you know the heart of an alien, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt. For six years you shall sow your land and gather in its yield; but the seventh year you shall let it rest and lie fallow, so that the poor of your people may eat; and what they leave the wild animals may eat. You shall do the same with your vineyard, and with your olive orchard.
……………………Exodus 23:1-11

When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very edges of your field, or gather the gleanings of your harvest. You shall not strip your vineyard bare, or gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the poor and the alien: I am the Lord your God. You shall not steal; you shall not deal falsely; and you shall not lie to one another. And you shall not swear falsely by my name, profaning the name of your God: I am the Lord. You shall not defraud your neighbor; you shall not steal; and you shall not keep for yourself the wages of a laborer until morning. You shall not revile the deaf or put a stumbling block before the blind; you shall fear your God: I am the Lord. You shall not render an unjust judgment; you shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great: with justice you shall judge your neighbor. You shall not go around as a slanderer among your people, and you shall not profit by the blood of your neighbor: I am the Lord. You shall not hate in your heart anyone of your kin; you shall reprove your neighbor, or you will incur guilt yourself. You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against any of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the Lord.
……………………Leviticus 19:9-18

The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants. Throughout the land that you hold, you shall provide for the redemption of the land. If anyone of your kin falls into difficulty and sells a piece of property, then the next of kin shall come and redeem what the relative has sold. If the person has no one to redeem it, but then prospers and finds sufficient means to do so, the years since its sale shall be computed and the difference shall be refunded to the person to whom it was sold, and the property shall be returned. But if there is not sufficient means to recover it, what was sold shall remain with the purchaser until the year of jubilee; in the jubilee it shall be released, and the property shall be returned. If anyone sells a dwelling house in a walled city, it may be redeemed until a year has elapsed since its sale; the right of redemption shall be one year. If it is not redeemed before a full year has elapsed, a house that is in a walled city shall pass in perpetuity to the purchaser, throughout the generations; it shall not be released in the jubilee. But houses in villages that have no walls around them shall be classed as open country; they may be redeemed, and they shall be released in the jubilee. As for the cities of the Levites, the Levites shall forever have the right of redemption of the houses in the cities belonging to them. Such property as may be redeemed from the Levites—houses sold in a city belonging to them—shall be released in the jubilee; because the houses in the cities of the Levites are their possession among the people of Israel. But the open land around their cities may not be sold; for that is their possession for all time. If any of your kin fall into difficulty and become dependent on you, you shall support them; they shall live with you as though resident aliens. Do not take interest in advance or otherwise make a profit from them, but fear your God; let them live with you. You shall not lend them your money at interest taken in advance, or provide them food at a profit. I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, to give you the land of Canaan, to be your God.
……………………Leviticus 25:23-38

Speak to the Israelites, and say to them: When you cross the Jordan into the land of Canaan, then you shall select cities to be cities of refuge for you, so that a slayer who kills a person without intent may flee there. The cities shall be for you a refuge from the avenger, so that the slayer may not die until there is a trial before the congregation. The cities that you designate shall be six cities of refuge for you: you shall designate three cities beyond the Jordan, and three cities in the land of Canaan, to be cities of refuge. These six cities shall serve as refuge for the Israelites, for the resident or transient alien among them, so that anyone who kills a person without intent may flee there.
……………………Numbers 35:10-15

“I charged your judges at that time: “Give the members of your community a fair hearing, and judge rightly between one person and another, whether citizen or resident alien. You must not be partial in judging: hear out the small and the great alike; you shall not be intimidated by anyone, for the judgment is God’s. Any case that is too hard for you, bring to me, and I will hear it.”
……………………Deuteronomy 1:16-17

For the Lord your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who is not partial and takes no bribe, who executes justice for the orphan and the widow, and who loves the strangers, providing them food and clothing. You shall also love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.
……………………Deuteronomy 10:17-19

As for the Levites resident in your towns, do not neglect them, because they have no allotment or inheritance with you. Every third year you shall bring out the full tithe of your produce for that year, and store it within your towns; the Levites, because they have no allotment or inheritance with you, as well as the resident aliens, the orphans, and the widows in your towns, may come and eat their fill so that the Lord your God may bless you in all the work that you undertake. Every seventh year you shall grant a remission of debts. And this is the manner of the remission: every creditor shall remit the claim that is held against a neighbor, not exacting it of a neighbor who is a member of the community, because the Lord’s remission has been proclaimed. Of a foreigner you may exact it, but you must remit your claim on whatever any member of your community owes you. There will, however, be no one in need among you, because the Lord is sure to bless you in the land that the Lord your God is giving you as a possession to occupy, if only you will obey the Lord your God by diligently observing this entire commandment that I command you today. When the Lord your God has blessed you, as he promised you, you will lend to many nations, but you will not borrow; you will rule over many nations, but they will not rule over you. If there is among you anyone in need, a member of your community in any of your towns within the land that the Lord your God is giving you, do not be hard-hearted or tight-fisted toward your needy neighbor. You should rather open your hand, willingly lending enough to meet the need, whatever it may be. Be careful that you do not entertain a mean thought, thinking, “The seventh year, the year of remission, is near,” and therefore view your needy neighbor with hostility and give nothing; your neighbor might cry to the Lord against you, and you would incur guilt. Give liberally and be ungrudging when you do so, for on this account the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in all that you undertake. Since there will never cease to be some in need on the earth, I therefore command you, “Open your hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land.”
……………………Deuteronomy 14:27-29, 15:1-11

If there is among you anyone in need, a member of your community in any of your towns within the land that the Lord your God is giving you, do not be hard-hearted or tight-fisted toward your needy neighbor. You should rather open your hand, willingly lending enough to meet the need, whatever it may be. Be careful that you do not entertain a mean thought, thinking, “The seventh year, the year of remission, is near,” and therefore view your needy neighbor with hostility and give nothing; your neighbor might cry to the Lord against you, and you would incur guilt. Give liberally and be ungrudging when you do so, for on this account the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in all that you undertake. Since there will never cease to be some in need on the earth, I therefore command you, “Open your hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land.”
……………………Deuteronomy 15:7-11

You shall appoint judges and officials throughout your tribes, in all your towns that the Lord your God is giving you, and they shall render just decisions for the people. You must not distort justice; you must not show partiality; and you must not accept bribes, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and subverts the cause of those who are in the right. Justice, and only justice, you shall pursue, so that you may live and occupy the land that the Lord your God is giving you.
……………………Deuteronomy 16:18-20

When you make your neighbor a loan of any kind, you shall not go into the house to take the pledge. You shall wait outside, while the person to whom you are making the loan brings the pledge out to you. If the person is poor, you shall not sleep in the garment given you as the pledge. You shall give the pledge back by sunset, so that your neighbor may sleep in the cloak and bless you; and it will be to your credit before the Lord your God. You shall not withhold the wages of poor and needy laborers, whether other Israelites or aliens who reside in your land in one of your towns. You shall pay them their wages daily before sunset, because they are poor and their livelihood depends on them; otherwise they might cry to the Lord against you, and you would incur guilt. Parents shall not be put to death for their children, nor shall children be put to death for their parents; only for their own crimes may persons be put to death. You shall not deprive a resident alien or an orphan of justice; you shall not take a widow’s garment in pledge. Remember that you were a slave in Egypt and the Lord your God redeemed you from there; therefore I command you to do this. When you reap your harvest in your field and forget a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it; it shall be left for the alien, the orphan, and the widow, so that the Lord your God may bless you in all your undertakings. When you beat your olive trees, do not strip what is left; it shall be for the alien, the orphan, and the widow. When you gather the grapes of your vineyard, do not glean what is left; it shall be for the alien, the orphan, and the widow. Remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt; therefore I am commanding you to do this.
……………………Deuteronomy 24:10-22

These are only some of the verses from the written Torah that are concerned with and advocate and demand and require inclusion, justice, forgiveness, and compassion. These are not the only verses – the entire scriptural collection, the Jewish Bible and the Christian Testament, repeatedly speaks of the same concerns, avocations, demands, and requirements. In this light, the scriptures are constantly calling us forward to a better and enlarging and more inclusive and maturing understanding of the will of God for us and for this world. God is always calling us from Exodus to the Promised Land. God is always calling us from Exile to return home.

The “will of God” – what God wants for us – is for us to:
……Be Free and Independent
……Think
……Be Curious
……Be Intelligent and Wise
……Value Knowledge over Ignorance and Compassion over Knowledge
……Be Creative
……Grow and Mature
……Live Long Healthy Satisfying Lives
……Live Non-Violently Without Vengeance
……Be Hospitable
……Be Generous
……Do No Harm
……Provide Justice as Healing and Rehabilitation and Restoration
……Be Forgiving
……Promote and Provide and Protect Reconciliation
……Be Good Stewards of all Resources
……Live Here as One Family
……Live in Loving Relationship with Grace-full God
……Be Transformed through Resurrection
……Be the Kingdom of God here and now

So how do we reclaim the Good News as the sole purpose for church? How do we reclaim the church for and as the Good News? How do we reclaim the church as a community and not as a scheduled activity with secondary social consequences? How do we reclaim the church as a community and not as an Empire organization based on and filled with hubris, sloth, and idolatry? How do we reclaim church as a place where people expect to grow and thrive emotionally, intellectually, theologically, and spiritually? How do we reclaim church as a community with a culture of love, grace, justice, compassion, affirmation, and encouragement for each individual?

There was a time when our choir, after singing the anthem, would leave their seats at the front of the sanctuary, move out into the congregation to be with their family, remove their full-length choir vestments, and sit down. A common tongue-in-cheek observation was that we were the only church in town (county? state?) where you could go to a worship service and watch people disrobe in public.

One way that the church can reclaim the Good News is to strip down to the bare necessities (deliberate song cue) – to start again with only God, Community, and Individuals. Remove burdensome structure – both administrative and physical. Remove all ecclesiastical hierarchy and all religious institutions. Remove all authoritarianism. If only for a month or two, meet for worship as a small group in the home of a member – and each week meet in the home of a different member. Collect offerings only for outreach. Eliminate the church governing board and board meetings. As detailed by Derek Penwell in Killing Church Committees and Other Reflections on Church Organization, eliminate committees and committee meetings. It is time to seriously consider eliminating: musical groups and instruments and rehearsals, fund-raisers, capital campaigns, financial systems, buildings, properties, employees, clergy, and membership rolls. This is not a denial of their “practical” benefits – it is an acknowledgement of how they too easily, even inescapably, become worldly consumptive replacements for the fulfilling and regenerative divine Good News – of how they too easily, even inescapably, become fatal distractions to our living and being the Kingdom of God.

Regardless of the physical and organizational implementation of church reformed and redefined…

Always Imagine
Church as worship, studying, sharing in word and service
to each other and to the world.

Always Imagine
Church as always living and being the Good News
as individuals and as community.

Always Imagine
Church as the Kingdom of God
in this world here and now.

Amen

Seven Years of Debt

In recent months there have been a string of reports about the student loan crisis, how it might be the next bubble to burst.  The crisis is happening now.  Outstanding student loans will exceed one trillion dollars this year. The average student graduates with over $25,000 in debt. There have been calls to forgive student loan debt  in blogs and in action.  Need to Know on PBS recently shared a good, concise understanding of the student loan crisis.

For those of us who are clergy and church leaders, student loans are an excruciating burden.  Most clergy starting salaries do not take into consideration student loan repayment, let alone cost of living.  Most congregations in the mainline tradition have not increased their pastor’s salaries to the rate of comparable leadership positions in the community, such as school principals and other educators.  In my experience in the American Baptist Churches, most of the time the guidelines for compensation are “suggested guidelines” and churches take them that way: merely as suggestions, not as advocating for fair compensation.  In addition, Carol Howard Merritt recently wrote about the “extra costs” that are sometimes added on by ordaining bodies and churches who want their candidate to have more experience.  When all this adds up, seminary itself is already becoming expensive, then there are the added costs of ordination requirements.

I was fortunate in that my grades from college were decent enough to earn me a good scholarship. I also qualified for some grants, and my seminary had a wonderful financial aid administrator at the time who slipped notes into my mailbox about every single $500 or $1000 little scholarship.  Those little scholarships made a difference.  However, I still ended up working at least 2 part time jobs every year (during my Field Education year, which included a stipend, I count 3 part-time jobs).   Needless to say, I didn’t date much when I was in seminary. I didn’t have much of a life outside of school and work, and somehow I was supposed to attend local, regional, and national events for my denomination as well, most of the time at my own expense.  My scholarships were only good for three years, so I managed to graduate in three years, taking courses every summer and winter, and loading up on 5 courses both the fall and spring of my final year.  My grades were not as good that last year because of it (luckily my seminary offered  a “pass/fail” option for some courses, so I was able to pass, but I must apologize to my church history professors for whom I rarely cracked a book that last year because I was too busy writing my ordination paper, trying to get an interview for a position, writing papers for my other classes and working those two jobs).  I graduated in May of 2002 without a dime owed to my seminary.

However, this was not the case for my college years.  Almost all clergy nowadays have seven years of higher education under their belt.  We’re not talking the four-year college debt that is leading to the national crisis. We’re talking seven.  So of my seven years, four I am still repaying.

I was seventeen when I was applying for college, filling out financial aid paperwork (oh, the dreaded FAFSA—but with the dawn of the internet it is so much easier than the long paperwork one had to file in the 90’s) and had no guidance when it came to student loans.  My parents, divorced only a few years before, were still arguing over finances.  The college fund I thought existed was long gone.  My father wrote a check for my housing deposit to get me started, but after my scholarships (I had decent grades in high school—no valedictorian but at least I made honors) and grants (my parent’s income was pretty abysmal) there was still a “projected parental contribution” that is included as part of the FAFSA process.  That parental contribution, for me and most of my friends, and I imagine for thousands of students, does not exist.  Just like with taxes and most other paperwork, numbers on paper does not equal dollars in the bank account.  There are other debts, medical expenses, and hardships that eat up that supposed parental contribution.  So at age seventeen, I signed away on a Perkins Loan, a Subsidized Stafford Loan, and the big one: a large private loan with rates that shifted between 8-9% interest while I was in college.

Who understands what $50,000 of student loans will look like when you are seventeen?  Who understands interest rates and monthly payments?  Who understands that your income will not meet the demands of paying off your student loans in a timely manner when you aren’t even old enough to vote yet?  Yes, my parents did sign on my student loans as they had to, but no one explained to me the amount of debt I was getting myself into. Not my parents, not my college, and certainly not the school guidance counselors who were so excited I was going to a private college, so excited that they could add me to the list of college-bound high-school graduates. They were the ones who actually told me about and encouraged me to apply for the private loans.

There is good news for my story: after deferring my student loans in seminary, when I graduated and became an associate minister my salary did not cover both my cost of living and my student loans (I was renting a shared house with 3 other seminary students and graduates, our rent was minimal, our utilities were split 4 ways, and we did not have cable—we lived very simply), I was able to consolidate my Stafford loan at a decent rate. I was able to adjust my payment plan for my Perkins loan. My private loan, however, did not offer any assistance, and so I continue to repay it at the full amount.  But I did receive some help from the Massachusetts Baptist Charitable Society, which altered its charter to help Baptist ministers serving in Massachusetts with the repayment of student loans.  Through that assistance, I managed to work away at my debt.  I no longer live in Massachusetts so I am ineligible for assistance from that organization, but through working two-part time jobs along with my chaplaincy position (along with my husband’s full-time ministry position, and he also has student loans!) I am almost done paying off my Perkins loan completely.  I will be celebrating in a few months.

My challenge is this, for our denominations and our congregations: we need to stop socking away money for buildings.  We need more organizations like the Massachusetts Baptist Charitable Society that can help clergy repay their student loans.  We need more counselors at the beginning of the process of both college and seminary to be up-front about debt, loans and interest rates before students enroll in classes.  For seminaries, we need to be especially honest with prospective students about debt and about calls to professional ministry: do seminaries accept more students so that they are able to make their ends meet with tuition dollars, or do they accept those students who clearly have a call to serving Christ and the Church?

For congregations, we need to recognize that if a congregation cannot afford to pay a minister a liveable wage, maybe they should not have a minister.  I’m serious about that.  I have known far too many churches that have paid housing allowances that would not even cover renting a studio apartment in their town.   And I’ve seen far too many churches in one small town, with lower attendance on Sunday morning and in weekly ministry activities, that have so much in common with their neighbors of the same denomination, or even across denominations.  We need to encourage more partnerships and even mergers, so that our congregations can give of their best, and their pastors can be fully compensated so that they can give of their best.   When resources become scarce, far too often support staff positions are cut and pastor compensation is frozen.  A church isn’t going to grow when that happens.  Rather, if resources are becoming limited, then a church needs to cast its vision outward rather than inward.  The church needs to look not at its own survival but how it can best serve Christ in the world—and that may mean partnering or merging with another congregation.

“Every seventh year you shall grant a remission of debts” (Deuteronomy 15:1).  Debt was a major concern of Moses and the Israelites as they established their communal practices. People needed to borrow from others to survive and debt was part of their society—in that debt is how most slaves came to be.  However, the tradition of Moses, the Israelites and of our Bible is to forgive debts, and to forgive them sooner rather than later.

There are some programs to help people with debt repayment: Income-Based Repayment Plan is not as well known as it should be, but it helps people pay off debts at rates based upon one’s income and forgives the rest after ten years.  But I think a Biblical model that denominations, seminaries and other religious bodies should use is the seven-year plan: if clergy and other church leaders go to school for seven years, four years of college plus three years of seminary (which is difficult in these days to complete 90 credits within three years, but some seminaries have cut back on the required number of credit hours for a Master of Divinity degree; my own seminary went from 90 to 81 credits, and some require only 72 credits for completion), then seven years is what it should take to repay back the student loans.  After that, we need a year of debt forgiveness.

It will be my ten year reunion from graduating seminary this spring; it will also mark ten years of repaying student loans.  I have five more to go.  Some of my colleagues are not as fortunate.  Some of my dearest friends live with their children in cramped 2-bedroom apartments because their churches sold the parsonage years ago, and provide a housing allowance that does not adequately provide for their family in the community they serve.  Most of my colleagues in ministry do not own their own home, unlike most of their congregants.  And as a result of lower compensation, most of my colleagues do not have sufficient funds in their retirement and work well beyond retiring years in at least part-time ministry positions to make up the difference.

We need a year of debt forgiveness.  Seven years of education, seven years of debt repayment is enough.  Let us uphold the Biblical model of debt forgiveness and strive for ways of adequately compensating our clergy and leaders, so that we can grow in our call to Christ’s ministry and serve the world as best as we are able.  And when tough decisions about resources have to be made, let us think about cutting compensation last and instead think about how we are best using our resources, because buildings are just buildings; clergy are people.

I’m NOT a Christian

After almost five months in Oregon, I am still making introductions, still getting to know this new place in which we have settled. While it is a joy to meet people and have new experiences, the number of faces and names are beginning to blur. I am waiting for the familiar to emerge. Since I have taken a new chaplaincy position, the flood of introductions and names has picked up speed instead of slowing. Familiar and comfortable are only illusions.

When meeting people for the first time, we do not just exchange names, we also exchange a bit of who we are. Perhaps it is a family detail: I have two adult children. Perhaps it is geography: I moved from West Virginia. Perhaps it is profession or vocation: I am an ordained minister.

People are gracious with introductions, sharing a few fragments of their own identity. Every so often, however, there is someone who is unable to hide the uncomfortable reaction they feel when they discover I am a Christian minister. Because people in general like to avoid confrontation, they change the subject, gloss over the fact, or say absolutely nothing filling the air with awkward, tense silence. God bless the soul who will address the elephant in the room standing before them.

“I am not a Christian,” came blurting out from his mouth with great energy, as if he had been holding his breath for a long time. “No offense,” he stammered, realizing what he had just uttered. “None taken.” He backpedalled a little, inserting, “I like Jesus and everything.” Interesting. Poor guy, he must feel like he has to be polite or something.

While looking at the table in front of him as if there was something quite fascinating happening on it, he let loose with the pain and grief of having been in The Church. He didn’t share details, only broad strokes of an all too familiar story. Raised in the church, there was a vindictive scene against his mother over a trivial thing. They searched for a while for another church home, only to have judgment, pettiness, and coldness greet them. The denomination, or lack of, made no difference in their experience. He furtively looked up at me during his tale, checking my reaction–waiting for the next condemning phrase to be proclaimed by a Christian. There was none.

Eyes back on the table, he expressed how his family had given up trying. He had better things to do during his college years than try to reconcile with a hurtful church. In his later twenties he felt that something was missing, but the wounds were too deep to return to a Christian context. He was searching even now, for the Ultimate. Reading about different religions and humanistic philosophies. “I know there is God or something, but I try to stay away from ‘churchy’ people. Maybe it is Jesus, but I can’t do church. Not any more.” His tone suggested that he avoided church like most people avoid poison ivy.

I made my chaplain responses. “That sounds like it was painful.” “You’re searching?” “What do you think church should be like?” “I’m sorry you had to go through that.” “Tell me about your journey now.” I had a few different emotions during our encounter. The first was a sense of encouragement I think. I was impressed that this person overcame his hesitation and spoke directly to a “church” person about how The Church hurt him. I felt sadness at his obvious pain. I felt angry that people proclaiming Christ could be so . . . so . . . so what? So unaware? So spiteful? So hurt themselves that they have to hurt others to feel good? What is it?

I doubt that young man will embrace church again. Perhaps I’m wrong. I hope I am. Nothing he has experienced thus far in his life has shown him that Christians want to accept him for who he is or lavish him with the abundant love that Christ showers on each of us. Hopefully the middle-aged chaplain that wandered into his room did not add to his pain. Maybe she even reflected a bit of the extravagant love of Christ that embraces both broken seekers and unkind church folk alike.

He answered, ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as yourself.’ Luke 10:27

Enemies, Trust, and Dying for Congregational Transformation

From time to time someone will come to my office, anxiety etched across the brow, looking for a listening ear. When I open the door on these occasions, I don’t know what kind of pain lies on the other side. I summon my best active listening practices from Pastoral Care 101, and I say, “What seems to be the trouble?”

“Well, Gladys and I have been having problems. You may have noticed we haven’t been around much lately.”

Sometimes I have, and sometimes I haven’t. I try to remain noncommittal: “I”m glad you’re here now.”

“Let me cut to the chase.”

(That’s good. I’m pro cut-to-the-chase.)

“I think Gladys has been having an affair with a co-worker…”

And with that we embark on an all too familiar journey into betrayal, fear, and recrimination.

I listen to another sad story, which often ends with a question. It’s a big question, one I never feel comfortable answering. People who come to see me with problems like this ask it anyway:

“What should I do?”

I know the difference between directive and non-directive counseling, between offering a way to move forward and offering the person the opportunity to make those kinds of discoveries and decisions. I often have a hard time keeping my mouth shut about what people ought to do, but in these situations, it always seems better (easier?) to go with a non-directive approach:

“What do you want to do?”

“That’s just it. I don’t know what to do. I lover her, but I don’t know if I’ll ever be able to trust her again.”

There it is. Trust.

Trust. Relationships require it if they have any chance at being healthy. To say that “once lost, trust is difficult to recover” is, surely, to have said something everyone already knows instinctively. How long does it take to quit checking text messages and phone logs? How much time has to elapse before you believe that a trip to the store for milk and bread is really a trip to the store for milk and bread?

Unfortunately, there’s no calculus capable of offering a quantifiable answer about how much time it takes to rebuild trust. However, one thing is certain: If trust is to be rebuilt, it won’t happen just because of the elapse of time. Trust takes work, hard, often tedious, repetitive, mind-numbing work. Showing up when you say you’re going to show up. Being where you said you’d be. Doing what you said you’d do. Going out of your way to reassure the other person.

No matter how strongly a person feels about having recovered, no matter how eloquent the protestations about “turning over a new leaf,” no matter how many genuine tears are shed seeking forgiveness, there’s no short cut to the actual work of rebuilding trust.

Everyone knows that, right?

The other side of it, though, which also seems equally self-evident, but often gets overlooked in the face of the pain is that the wounded party has to want to heal, has to want to find trust again. This too requires work.

It’s possible to bang your head against a wall for someone who appears only to relish the sight of you concussing yourself. It is impossible to heal, however, when the infliction of pain becomes the glue that holds the relationship together.

Betrayal and the Congregation

It occurs to me that many churches have been wounded, whether by promiscuous pastors who took advantage, or by unprincipled lay leadership, or by denominational neglect–or just because the organizational system was set up to fail. Whatever the cause, the first casualty of betrayal is trust.

Unfortunately, the lack of trust in wounded congregations is a self-destructive feedback loop of bitterness and distrust that inhibits healthy growth and creativity. Distrust in a congregational system treats all change as equally menacing, treats everything new (people, programs, ideas) as presumably hostile–until proven otherwise.

A trip to the store for bread and milk is always assumed to be a pretext for something else, something surely more nefarious.

A new Sunday School class can never be just a new Sunday School class; it’s an indictment of the other Sunday School classes or a new avenue for some hostile party to consolidate power.

A change to the worship service or to the worship space is either an attack on tradition or a play to increase the power base of some suspicious constituency–or both.

What gets communicated in a wounded system where trust has been lost is: “We’re not quite sure yet how you’re trying to screw us over, but we’re pretty sure you are. Therefore, we’re withholding approval and/or permission.”

Has your church lost trust? Here’s an informal checklist:

  • Do you regularly have meetings that last longer than 2 hours?
  • Do people bring dog-eared copies of Robert’s Rules of Order to board meetings?
  • Do you hear at least one reference to the Constitution and By-laws at every meeting?
  • Do people bring their own calculators and red pens to the meeting where the budget is being proposed?
  • Do you have meetings where there are arguments about whether everybody on staff “really needs their own stapler?”
  • Does rearranging the furniture in the narthex or switching brands of air freshener require board approval? (Bonus: If really bad, does it require congregational approval?).
  • Do you have a lot of congregational meetings?
  • Does the announcement of a meeting elicit a particular kind of feeling in your stomach?
  • Do you keep an extra bottle of Rolaids in your car for use before meetings?
  • Does recruiting for congregational officers evoke anxiety not for a fear of who will say “no,” but for fear of who will say “yes?”
  • Do you require a doctor’s note from staff who call in sick?
  • Do you have people who regularly drive by the church to see if the pastor’s car is there?

How Can We Trust Again?

I wish it were easy. It’s not.

I wish I could point you toward “7 easy steps to recovering your trust.” I can’t.

It all comes down to this: a wounded congregation must make a decision to begin trying to trust again. You may get burned. But relationship is always a crap shoot.

How about this?

  • Be mindful that each positive step in which you don’t get hurt is a step in the right direction.
  • Call attention to and celebrate positive steps.
  • Give people the benefit of the doubt. Don’t enter every new situation convinced you’re going to get burned.
  • Assume people (even those who feel like the “enemy”) are telling the truth until you find out otherwise.
  • Don’t get into the habit of thinking of people with whom you share the body of Christ as the “enemy.” It’s too difficult to pull back from the precipice.

Even if trust hasn’t been restored, you’re going to have to live like it has. Until you can live together with a commitment to restoring trust, ministry, if possible at all, can only be tenuous and fragile.

And if all else fails, remember, it’s God’s church–not your’s (or your “enemy’s”).

Besides, trusting your enemy is just about impossible–although dying for your enemy has been done before.

Tikkun Olam and Starfish

I started mentoring at my 6-year-old’s school, and even got paired with one of her classmates!  Alijah struggles with basic schoolwork and behavior, and the school Counselors think it’d be good for him to have a male adult in his life, that could make 30 minutes a week for–just, him, and the many things they could do together.  I’m just the man for the job!

.
I find great meaning in this kind of work, because it’s the only way to do the work God needs me to do in the world.  As much as I’d like, I can’t save the whole world.  God calls none of us to do that.  God does call us to what our Jewish neighbors refer to as “tikkun olam,” or repair of the universe, one piece at a time.  The universe is broken, in so many ways, and God has created us to help repair one small part of it–our part, formed and shaped for us, big enough to do something about, constructed just so. We are the ones for the job.  God’s counting on us to help out, ‘cuz She can’t take care of it all on her own.

.
Alijah is a part of my part, and I also see him as one of my starfish.  One of my tattoos is a starfish.  The Starfish Story has always been a powerful one for me (adapted over and over from Loren Eiseley’s “Starfish Thrower” essay (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Star_Thrower), a good adaptation here- http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art8236.asp).  I just had to get some ink as a constant reminder of it.  I can’t save the whole world.  As much as it pains me to look down the whole beach, and see them all, I can’t throw back every starfish into the ocean.  I’m only one person, limited in space and time.  But I can look, down, and, see, this, one….right at my feet.  And I can help that one.  HOLY SHIT, I CAN HELP THAT ONE!

.
And so I must.  And so off I go to my 6-year-old’s school.  Just once a week, one half-hour or so.  With just one person, who really only needs one little bit of my time.  And in that–with and through Alijah–I’ve helped to save the world.  To repair the universe.  To clear the beach.

.
I hope and pray that you  you can find your own starfish, and all the other little ways God calls you to repair Her creation….

Autism Sculpts Divine Desire (ASDD)

Have you ever had to run to the store for diapers?  Well for the first 20 months or so of our son’s life we used cloth diapers, so it was never for diapers that I ran to the store.  At about that time he grew out of the cloth diapers we owned, we figured we would use disposable diapers until he was potty trained instead of making a large investment.  Of course we were quite optimistic, and continue to be.  It truly was not out of the question, for he was already learning things quickly and was sitting well on the thrown.  Little did we know that 22 months later he would still not be potty trained which we attribute to his development of autism.

Now I keep a standing order of disposable diapers online so I save money, but this night we were too low before the next delivery, so I went out to Walmart.  It was late evening and busy, but not crowded.  I found myself walking through the section of Christmas items on sale, which was what we packed away earlier that day, since Epiphany had arrived.  Around the corner was another aisle of toys that were on sale.  I began to look for a toy on sale for my son.  I thought I could find a bargain and surprise him.  I must have taken ten minutes looking at all these fun toys that were on sale, but I could not find anything.   I could find many items that were age appropriate, many items that were fun, but none seemed right.

I then remembered that there were still two wrapped presents under the tree that we took down that afternoon.  They were both for our son, and it was not that he had an excessive number of presents.  This three-year-old had really no interest in Santa, or the reindeer.  He met that jolly man three times during Advent, was never scared, but also never interested.  We learned he liked the lights, the tree, and the song “Jingle Bells” (it may help that Elmo utilizes the tune for all his songs).  AJ’s stocking had a few presents, and that included his two favorites: chocolate peanut butter cups and a DVD with the Wonder Pets on it.  After that he was done; the bubble machine was loud, the books were fine,  the clothes fun for his parents, but the change of routine to rip paper off boxes was simply uninteresting to him; honestly he seem annoyed we kept showing him these wrapped items.

I should not have been so surprised, for 5 months earlier at his birthday party, his first present was a book he loved.  He opened it, saw an open place on the couch, ran from my lap where he was the center of attention, and sat right down amongst his party guests to read his beloved book.  We had to give up on him opening presents and had his “friends” open the gifts as he read his book.

Of course as a parent I am responsible to teach him, and have him taught. Of course there is the cliché that children teach us grown people, as well as Jesus telling adults to be like children.  However, there is something unique a child (a person) with autism can teach all of us, especially the church.

I believe there is a theological anthropology which helps our understanding how the Divine works with us messy humans.  An important part of this theological anthropology includes the theory of mimesis.  This theory is based on the fact that humans are social beings and our individuality and desires are based on the desires of others.  Even babies develop by mimicking their caregivers.  “It is made concrete in the imitation, learning, and repetition which is what enables an infant to become a socialized human being” (Alison 28). However, as humans develop we are socialized through  imitation and modeling, which is evident by the draw of a baby to the adult caregivers. “We all take such a draw, such a movement, for granted, though of course it isn’t automatic, as is evidenced by autistic children, who lack precisely the attraction, the draw the movement toward an adult” (Allison 27-28) I agree that my son proves that human beings are socially as well as biologically reared to adulthood, as we are struggling to teach and demonstrate the importance of the draw of socialization, especially communication.  Mimetic Theory  truly has great implication for our development of religion and our salvation through Jesus the Christ, who does not deny these desires, but wants us to model them after the perfect Divine:

‘You have heard that it was said, “You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.” But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be children of your Father in heaven; for he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax-collectors do the same? And if you greet only your brothers and sisters, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect. (Matthew 5:43-48)

However, our socialization is based on the mimetic relationship with other humans, and not inherently the Divine.  The end result is violence.  This violence can be direct, but often results in scapegoating that happens because humans desire the same object, position, etc.  This violence is exactly what Jesus found Himself hung on a tree from, but is exactly what He saves us from.  Our desires should line up with the new age opened by the Resurrection.  However, we still have one foot in our world that our individuality is formed by the desires of others and often comes into conflict. This, though, brings up the issue of how a child with autism models someone that can avoid mimetic violence.

Walmart does sell basic items for life: fruit, vegetables, and coffee; yet much of the items depend on our desire to have items we do not truly need, but because we desire to be like others, we end up buying these items.  Of course I am not immune, which was very evident when I kept searching for a toy for AJ.  Now a lot of children have enough toys, or more toys than others, but for AJ it is that he does not fully participate in mimetic desire.  He is also still young, but generally a boy approaching 3 ½ years will want toys and not just the box (and he doesn’t even want a box either).  I watched all but one other child in his Headstart class (another boy on the spectrum), get excited and communicate their desires to a wonderful man dressed up like Santa.  That time we did get a good picture of our son with Santa, for in his stocking was an apple.  He was enamored at the apple, for he likes apples and he explored the smooth red surface as we snapped pictures, no idea he was the center of attention, nor was he going to sit with the man in the red suit.

AJ’s desires are not based as clearly on the reflection from others as a neurologically normal child.  Let me be quite frank, it is difficult, heart wrenching, scary, sad, and wonderful.  Wonderful, I write, because he makes us wonder about life.  I realized that I had been sucked into needing to buy a toy, because my desire is influenced by others and I desire to be like others.  That realization came from my son’s modeling of developing his identity with much less care of other’s desires.  What a great lesson.

The work ahead of us is to keep some of the special and unique advantages of his thinking while encouraging socialization and communication.  Honestly, I believe the best way is for those of us that are socialized to realize our desires can be based on the model Jesus suggests, which is the action of love, and that is the one desire my son has, and he has for every human being.  He is consistent and perfect like the Divine parent.  We all learn from our children; yet I believe those with the unique take on mimetic desire can teach us, as we teach them to communicate.  My prayer is that I can teach AJ to communicate, and yet still keep the desire of love the first priority; for if we model Jesus’ love, will that not be the social normative?

Work Cited:  Alison, James. The Joy of Being Wrong: Original Sin Through Easter Eyes. New York:  Crossroad, 1998

The Creatively Maladjusted

Given the fact that it is the birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and injustice toward LGBTQ people persists, I thought I might offer a few thoughts about what it means to remain silent in the face of that injustice–and about what it means not to, what it means to be creatively maladjusted.  Disclaimer: My analogy with the Civil Rights movement is only meant to be suggestive, not to establish easy equivalences.

A version of this article first appeared at The Company of the Eudaimon.

The Passover of the Jews was near, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.  In the temple he found people selling cattle, sheep, and doves, and the money changers seated at their tables.  Making a whip of cords, he drove all of them out of the temple, both the sheep and the cattle.  He also poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.  He told those whowere selling the doves, “Take these things out of here!  Stop making my Father’s house a marketplace!”  His disciples remembered that it was written, “Zeal for your house will consume me.”  The Jews then said to him, “What sign can you show us for doing this?”  Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:1319).

Following the first miracle at the wedding in Cana, Jesus and his new disciples take a few days off, then head into Jerusalem.

Where do they go?  Straight to the temple.

What happens?  Jesus makes a whip of cords and starts turning over the tables of the money changers.  He’s ranting and raving about how they’re turning God’s house into a marketplace.  The folks in charge don’t much care for his attitude and say, “Who are you?  What sign can you show us for doing this?”  Then, Jesus commits the ultimate Jewish faux pas by saying, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.”

What Jesus has done, in effect, after making such a grand splash at the wedding at Cana, is to guarantee that the very people who might have helped promote his ministry are the ones whom he has alienated by his little foray into temple finances.  He’s made some pretty influential enemies in his first trip to Jerusalem.

So what?  What’s the significance?

Well, think about it.  When Jesus cleanses the temple in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, it occurs at the very end of Jesus’ ministry—after entering Jerusalem on Palm Sunday and just before being snatched up and crucified on Good Friday—which, if you think about it, makes more sense.  You can see why Jesus would be upset with the religious establishment in Matthew, Mark, and Luke.  They’ve hounded him for three years, and are plotting to kill him.  A little righteous indignation seems appropriate.

But in John, the cleansing of the temple comes right at the beginning of Jesus’ ministry.  He’s had nothing but smooth sailing up to this point.  Why upset the temple bigwigs right off the bat?  It makes much less sense, from a narrative standpoint, to have Jesus challenge the money changers in the temple just as his ministry is taking off.  Why does John set up the story this way?

John puts the story of the cleansing of the temple right next to the wedding at Cana on purpose.  He’s making some rhetorical hay about the shape and trajectory of Jesus ministry.

What do I mean?

Well, how must the disciples be feeling after seeing Jesus pull a Bobby Knight in the temple? They have to be terribly confused.  They thought they were getting a pretty engaging guru, fun to have around at parties, somebody to keep the open bar open—but what they got instead was a loose cannon, an unpredictable guy who knows his way around the business end of a whip.  Jesus’ impatience with the way things are calls to mind what Martin Luther King wrote in Strength to Love:

 “Human salvation lies in the hands of the creatively maladjusted.”

Well, Jesus is nothing if not creatively maladjusted.

Jesus explodes our tame, self-aggrandizing expectations about how joining up with him will be the end of our problems.  John wants to show us that just because you follow Jesus doesn’t mean everything magically becomes sweetness and light.  In fact, joining up with Jesus may cause you a whole new set of problems you might otherwise have avoided if you’d just stayed home and watched Jeopardy.  Sometimes we have to follow Jesus into the temple, where only hostility awaits us.

And that bothers us, doesn’t it?  If not, we haven’t been paying attention to what happens to people willing to walk into the teeth of the storm.

In April of 1963, a group of well-meaning (I think) white clergy in Alabama got together and issued a statement calling for the end of demonstrations they considered “unwise and untimely,” by “some of our Negro citizens, directed and led in part by outsiders,” even though this group of white clergy recognized “the natural impatience of people who feel their hopes are slow in being realized.”  Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., whose birthday we celebrate today, responded to these clergy in his, now famous, Letter from a Birmingham Jail.  Not surprisingly, Dr. King’s anger at the unjust social systems made bolder through their embodiment in law is present throughout his letter, raising again the Augustinian question about whether unjust laws—laws that degrade “human personality” and “distort the soul”—ought rightfully to be considered laws at all.

Dr. King reserves his biggest disappointment, however, for the church.  He rightly criticizes white moderates, whom he considered to be “more devoted to ‘order’ than to ‘justice’; who prefer a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice.”   He speaks candidly in his letter about weeping because of the laxity the church, about how “blemished and scarred” is the body of Christ “through social neglect and through fear of being nonconformist.”

At one point, Dr. King recalls with a certain wistfulness “a time when the church was very powerful.”  It’s interesting to note, though, just how he sees the church’s relationship to that power.  The church was at its most transformative, he argues,

“when the early Christians rejoiced at being deemed worthy to suffer for what they believed. In those days the church was not merely a thermometer that recorded the ideas and principles of popular opinion; it was a thermostat that transformed the mores of society.  Whenever the early Christians entered a town, the people in power became disturbed and immediately sought to convict the Christians for being ‘disturbers of the peace’ and ‘outside agitators.’  But the Christians pressed on, in the conviction that they were a ‘colony of heaven,’ called to obey God rather than humans.  Small in number, they were big in commitment.  They were too God-intoxicated to be ‘astronomically intimidated.’  By their efforts and their example they brought an end to such ancient evils as infanticide, and gladiatorial contests.”

It occurs to me that we who have committed ourselves and our communities of faith to seeking justice, in this case for LGBTQ people, are the inheritors of that legacy—a legacy that hears the cries of inequity and injustice, and remains incapable of turning a deaf ear.

We are the spiritual offspring of the creatively maladjusted.  We cannot stand by and do nothing.  We join together across the diversity of theological and denominational lines to take our place in the procession—a procession that, just in this country alone, stretches back through the Civil Rights movement, through women’s suffrage, and through the abolition of slavery.

We are people who cannot abide and will not stomach the excuses offered up by unjust systems that somehow “now is not the time,” or that raising a ruckus only contributes to the problem.  We draw together because we’ve been called to do justice, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with God—not because there is anything necessarily heroic in us, but because we’ve been passed a torch by heroes and saints who’ve gone before us, and who have called us to bear witness that God is not satisfied with either an unjust society or a lazy church “more devoted to ‘order’ than to ‘peace.’”

There’s a constituency within the church today urging caution, who think it “unwise and untimely” to press the issue of the full inclusion of LGBTQ people within the church, even though this constituency recognizes “the natural impatience of people who feel their hopes are slow in being realized.”  They believe that taking any kind of a stand will be heavy-handed and disruptive, while failing to realize that, if Jesus is our model, heavy-handed disruption of the existing unjust order is sometimes not the thing we wait for the right time to pursue, but the very thing with which we lead, the thing that sets the shape and trajectory of our ministry.
.
If we are indeed the offspring of the creatively maladjusted, we will never have a better time than the celebration of the birth of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to start living like it.

OCCUPY ROME

The great crime against the Roman Empire by the early church
was neither political opposition nor armed insurrection –
it was much worse.

The great crime of the early church
was to ignore and sidestep the Empire
proving that The Way of the Empire was not absolute
making The Way of the Empire irrelevant.

The Way of the Empire is
piety, war, victory, peace
the Emperor is Lord
relational complexity
relations as conquests and politics.

The Way of the Empire is,
for the individual,
success or failure
failure as poverty, hunger, nakedness, powerlessness, servitude, slavery, early death
success as wealth, well-fed, fine clothing, political influence, military command, long life.

The Way of the Empire is
inevitable, inescapable, singular, myopic –
there is no other way.

The Way of the Good News is
the personal and persistent unrestrained love and unconditional grace of God and
the feeding quenching clothing healing visiting welcoming compassion and
the reparative rehabilitating restorative justice of the Community and
the inclusive hospitality and joyous generosity and healthy service of the Individual.

The Way of the Good News is
an earthly life of divine wisdom
centered in the perpetual presence of God
requiring no piety, no war, no conquests
requiring no militant victories, no war-won war-worn peace
requiring no Empire
ignoring Empire responses, dismissing Empire demands
making Empire expectations, attitudes, values, requirements irrelevant
negating Empire culture, dismantling Empire government
displacing The Way of the Empire
with The Way of the Good News
living fearlessly and simply and together
as a sharing Community and a loving Family and a grace-full Kingdom of God.

I am invited to commit the same great crime.
The Way I choose is…?

Inclusion and Discipleship

A post by Methodist blogger Alan Bevere has stayed with me since it was originally published back in June of this year. The post, “So, Just How Inclusive Was Jesus?” muses on the modern value of inclusion and how it does and doesn’t square with Jesus.

I agree with Tom Wright that modern notions of inclusiveness are too broad and too shallow. Of course there is an inclusive aspect of the Gospel; it is, after all, offered to everyone. But one cannot avoid that along with the inclusive nature of the Gospel in the New Testament, there is also an exclusive character as well. One simply cannot read Jesus or Paul and conclude otherwise.
The fact that many Christians in the twenty-first century church do not understand this is revealed in the recent hoopla over Rob Bell’s book, Love Wins. Bell rightly believes that the question “Is Gandhi in hell?” should not necessarily be answered in the affirmative, and those who confidently think otherwise need to remember that God is quite unconcerned over what they think about the eternal destiny of others. At the same time, those who have been so quick to hop on the universalism bandwagon need to remember that there is another question that should be asked as well: “Is Hitler in heaven?”
But the purpose of this post is not to focus only on the hereafter, but to highlight what Bockmuehl and Michael are rightly saying about our present situation. Current accounts of inclusiveness are indebted much more to modernity than they are to the New Testament. Richard Hays words need to be heard: Jesus is not only the friend of sinners but he is the nemesis of the wicked. The issue is not the truly inclusive nature of the Gospel, but the imposition of a broad and shallow modern inclusivism that does indeed come at a high moral price. Bishop William Willimon reminds us that during his ministry Jesus drove away more people than he attracted.
The issue of inclusiveness is one that is near and dear to my heart. As a gay man, I know that the church has at times been too exclusive, keeping folks like myself out of the church. I’ve worked towards helping churches become more welcoming of LGBT persons.
But I wonder at times is if being welcoming is enough for Christians. Yes, it’s good to be inclusive, but as Bevere notes, Jesus also tended to drive people away from him as much as he drew people to him. Jesus called people to a life of discipleship, which is not always well recieved by people.
My fear more often than not is that our talk of inclusion is as Alan says, too shallow. It’s an inclusion that doesn’t talk about sin or confession, let alone discipleship. When it comes to the inclusion of LGBT persons, the talk is one of grace, a message that we need to hear. But a grace that doesn’t change the person or asks nothing of that person is a cheap grace indeed. Here’s what I wrote in response to Alan’s post:
Alan, thanks for the post. As usual, it was thought-provoking and something I’ve been thinking about for a while.
That said, I want to put some flesh and bone on the issue of inclusiveness.
As a gay man, I do understand and appreciate the call to be inclusive and welcoming. There are a lot of folks who have felt left out of the church because of their sexuality. But as someone who is also an ordained minister (in the Disciples of Christ), heck as a Christian, I know that we are called to be more than simply inclusive. As much as I find some parts of Christianity too quick to draw boundaries that I believe is up to God, I tend to find the drive towards inclusion at all costs kind of shallow. I mean, inclusion is a wonderful thing, but if there is no talk of the cross, or faith, or sin or forgiveness, then what you have is a very thin theology indeed.
What I long for is something you said in a previous comment, a balance between inclusion and repentance. People need to know that they are loved by God, but they also need to have room for repentance as well.
Inclusion alone works in the wider society. It’s valuable and needed. But in the life of the church, we are also called to repentance. I know that’s a scary word for LGBT folks because it’s been used to call our sexuality sin. But even though it has been used in less than ideal ways, the message is still there: we are called to repent. Not of being gay, but of the ways we hurt each other, the whole of creation and God. If all we have is just inclusion, what we have done is nothing more than bolster someone’s self esteem. That’s not a bad thing, but it’s not what following Jesus is all about.

Crossposted at Questor Pastor.

Reading the Bible, Again

On January 1st, in the evening, I picked up my Bible that I had been given at my baptism, flipped to the “Read The Bible Through a Year” chart, and began with day one.  I’ve read the Bible all the way through twice, once taking several years just reading a chapter an evening, and once in our first year of marriage, JC and I read the “One Year Bible.”  But I’ve begun this project many times throughout the years, only to fail for one of two reasons: I get behind in my daily reading about midway through January, or I get bored in Leviticus.

I’ve heard a number of mainline preachers over the years say you shouldn’t read the Bible straight through: there’s a lot of useless information such as the “Begats” which you don’t need to know, plus all the outdated law codes, and on top of it, the stories may begin in chronological order but it gets messy in the history and prophets—they weren’t written in chronological order to begin with.

Another argument I hear against reading the Bible straight through is from those who came out of more fundamentalist/evangelical traditions, who argue that they were forced to read the Bible this way, as-is, verse by verse, with no study guide or in-depth study on what they were reading.

But I think there’s something missing by not reading the Bible all the way through, at least once in your lifetime. This is how our scriptures have been put together. This is the canon we have now (though one can argue for Protestants this version has been around for much less time than the fuller version our Catholic and Orthodox siblings have).  This is the Bible, love it or loathe it, that we have, that millions around the world read (of course in various languages, translations and paraphrases).

I love the simple fact that I and perhaps thousands of other people have begun reading the Bible together on January 1st.  We may be reading at different paces, with different charts, we may get behind or read more quickly, but almost all of us started on January 1st with Genesis 1:1 and will end on December 31st with Revelation 22:21. Some of us will read the Psalms throughout the year, some of us will read both Old and New Testaments at the same time, but we all are reading these scriptures together, throughout the year, in an individual but collective way, as Christians and as skeptics, as conservative and as liberals, from all walks of life.

There are other reasons for reading the Bible all the way through as well: every time I read it, I understand a passage differently.  I pick up on something I didn’t before (Digression: This time, only eleven days in I have noticed that in Genesis 5:29 Noah is really the first Messianic figure in a sense: “He named him Noah, saying ‘Out of the ground that the Lord had cursed this one shall bring us relief from our work and from the toil of our hands.’“  I had never noticed that before—that the curse Adam experiences after disobeying God in the garden, which is the basis of the doctrine of original sin, is overcome with Noah, prophesied at his birth by his name!) I know the context of all those verses that have been taken out of context and use as proof texts for Scripturally-based arguments.  I remember where certain passages and stories are in the Bible more clearly each time I read when someone asks me my opinion or has a question about the Bible.  I gain new, fresh insights on the Scriptures and on their application in my own life.

As clergy, I think the practice of reading Scripture as a spiritual practice is a tough discipline to take on. We have to read the Bible to prepare for Sunday sermons or Bible studies.  We read it as part of our work, part of the job we do, and it’s hard to look at the Scripture without a critical eye for study or how to bring the Scripture to relevancy in our congregational life.  It can be difficult to let go and read the Scriptures in a way that is part of our spiritual life.  I think of all spiritual practices that clergy and lay leaders engage in both in leadership and in personal life—such as prayer, charity, fellowship, etc—devotional reading of the Scriptures may be the hardest to do in our personal life.  This does not mean to take away our critical eye or to not store away and take notes for sermons in the future, but it does mean to allow for the words to simply be sacred, for the words to simply be inspiring, for the words of Scripture to connect us with the Divine.  Lectio Divina is a practice that has become popular again in recent years, in Protestant circles as well as Catholic, as a way of prayerfully reading and meditating on the Scriptures, rather than studying and critiquing them.

So as this New Year is still dawning, there is still time to develop a practice of reading the Scriptures devotionally. You don’t have to do it in a year’s time, just one chapter a day.  Or you can double-up and be caught up by the end of January if you prefer.  I continue to marvel in the new insights I find in Scripture, and at the fact that millions around the world declare the Bible to be their sacred scripture, and that thousands of us are trying to read it all in a year, every year.